Better Practices in Scientific Publishing

  • Author: Jonathan Faiz
  • Published Date: 26 January 2016
  • Source / Publisher: Angewandte Chemie International Edition/Wiley-VCH
  • Copyright: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
thumbnail image: Better Practices in Scientific Publishing

There are two areas in scientific publishing that need improvement. One is peer review, and the other is transparent information about author contributions to a manuscript. In his Editorial in Angewandte Chemie, Richard N. Zare from Stanford University, CA, USA, discusses these two areas.

Zare points out that with the greater number of submitted papers and the larger demands on referees' time, obtaining quality referee reports is becoming more difficult and referees need some sort of recognition for their valuable work. Zare proposes that, instead of adopting a double-blind process, journals publish lists of their referees and how many reports they write. He also believes that all authors of a paper should explicitly state their contributions to the work in order to make the publishing process more transparent. This would also help when making decisions about awards or promotions.


Also of Interest


Article Views: 2867

Sign in Area

Please sign in below

Additional Sign In options

Please note that to comment on an article you must be registered and logged in.
Registration is for free, you may already be registered to receive, e.g., the newsletter. When you register on this website, please ensure you view our terms and conditions. All comments are subject to moderation.

Article Comments - To add a comment please sign in

Bookmark and Share

If you would like to reuse any content, in print or online, from, please contact us first for permission. more

CONNECT: on Facebook on Twitter on YouTube on LinkedIn Sign up for our free newsletter

Magazine of Chemistry Europe (16 European Chemical Societies)published by Wiley-VCH