Here we propose to get to the bottom of the chemical consequences of a night of celebrating to excess.
With regard to effects of ethanol on physical and mental performance, the intoxication phase is what usually occupies center stage. But physiological changes don’t end with the return to a normal blood-alcohol concentration. That is the point at which the hangover begins, with its many unpleasant consequences (Tab. 2) .
Though it is common simply to smile at the notion of a hangover, which in most cases proves to be self-healing, this nevertheless represents a health condition to take seriously, and one with major economic consequences. Numerous studies in various industrialized countries have shown that hangovers result in economic damage on the order of several hundred euros per person and year. Apart from absenteeism, the highest of the costs stem from — mostly unnoticed — losses in productivity. Studies with pilots, motorists, and skiers show that performance is greatly reduced during a hangover, and the risk of accidents increases.
Table 2. Relative frequency of various hangover symptoms.
It is surprising that, despite its economic significance, the mechanisms and physiological causes of the hangover have never been a focus of serious scientific interest. Perhaps this is because many — and not merely victims, but also scientists — believe that a hangover is a legitimate and deserved punishment for senseless, exorbitant drinking, and that a self-induced and self-healing disease doesn’t warrant the effort and expense associated with a thorough scientific investigation.
Before we unravel the mystery of the hangover from a chemical standpoint, we should recognize that a bacchanalian revel leads to no place other than a serious case of ethanol poisoning, which in turn produces significant disruptions and changes in a number of metabolic processes throughout the body. This explains why different people perceive hangovers so differently. Even a single individual may, after ingestion of a given amount of alcohol, experience both the intoxicating effects and their repercussions entirely differently on different days.
One part of the secret associated with the hangover derives from the fact that the syndrome itself is poorly defined in terms of physiological measurement. Consequently there are no objective bases for evaluating the seriousness of the condition, because subjectively the symptoms are perceived differently, with a very wide range of variation. In what follows, possible biochemical sources of some of these symptoms are considered.
To begin with, alcohol has a diuretic effect, which is to say that it causes an increase in the production and excretion of urine.
After drinking about three shots of 100 proof spirits (ca. 50 g of ethanol in 120 mL of liquid), one would eliminate in the hours that follow between 600 and 1000 mL of water (roughly 1.5 to 2 pints).
Ethanol decreases release of the antidiuretic hormone vasopressin from the posterior pituitary, which reduces reabsorption of water in the kidneys, so more urine is excreted.
Vomiting, sweating, and diarrhea also increase the loss of fluids and electrolytes, leading to dryness of the mouth, thirst, and dizziness, all typical hangover symptoms. This corresponds to clinical experience showing that water intake during a period of hangover can relieve these particular symptoms.
Hypoglycemia and Acidosis
A drop in the NAD+/NADH ratio has far-reaching consequences for metabolism in general. It leads to an accumulation of lactic acid (acidosis), and lowered production of glucose (gluconeogenesis), i.e., the glucose concentration in the blood declines. Overall, the resulting hypoglycemia causes general bodily weakness as well as mood changes; also typical hangover symptoms.
Fructose is metabolized in the body to glyceraldehyde, which is then reduced by NADH to glycerin. This produces NAD+, which could in principle raise a depressed NAD+/NADH ratio. Unfortunately, the fructose intake required is far too great for such an effect ordinarily to be perceptible. An attempt some years ago in British pubs to sell fructose tablets as a “sobering agent” for use after a round of carousing had to be abandoned for this reason on account of demonstrable ineffectiveness.
Disturbances in the Gastrointestinal Tract
Alcoholic beverages with low alcohol content (e.g., aperitifs) stimulate the production of stomach acid. Hard drinks with greater than 20 vol % alcohol irritate the stomach lining, leading to inflammation (gastritis). Moreover, pancreatic secretion is stimulated, and intestinal activity increased. These effects taken together can contribute to the stomach and abdominal pains, nausea, and vomiting typical of a hangover.
Sleep Disorders and Circadian Rhythm Alteration
Although alcohol has a sedative effect, and causes one to become sleepy, sleep that follows inebriation tends to be of short duration, and offers little restorative value. The 24-hour rhythm of body temperature is also affected, since one’s temperature is reduced during the period of inebriation and increased in a hangover. Moreover, overall hormone production by the pituitary gland is altered, so one’s day-night rhythm becomes discombobulated, and a hangover might even be viewed as analogous to “jet lag”.
Alcohol causes expansion of the blood vessels, and this can cause a headache. Alcohol also influences the production and effectiveness of numerous compounds in the central nervous system, including neurotransmitters, histamine, serotonin, and prostaglandins. All this could also contribute to headaches, although the true direct source of the relationship between alcohol consumption and headaches remains in doubt.
Since some hangover symptoms resemble signs of withdrawal suffered by alcoholics, it might be that a hangover could be regarded as an early, mild form of a withdrawal effect. This hypothesis is in fact widespread, but the two conditions can be sharply differentiated.
Many hangover symptoms, such as diminished brain wave activity, absence of increased blood pressure, dehydration, nausea, and dry mouth are seldom observed during alcohol withdrawal in the case of chronic drinkers. Some of the physiological changes (cytokine and thromboxane production) resemble those of a viral infection, and indeed the symptoms of flu are similar to those of a hangover.
The acetaldehyde resulting from oxidation of ethanol is highly reactive and toxic, and it reacts with numerous metabolic products. In most people, acetaldehyde is decomposed so quickly that, although in the wake of inebriation there is indeed an increase in the blood concentration of acetaldehyde, it always remains under 2 µg/L. In a fraction of the oriental population, however, the acetaldehyde concentration after drinking rises quickly to a twenty-fold value, and this in turn triggers drastic hangover symptoms, so some researchers have come to regard acetaldehyde as the true culprit in inducing hangovers.
Methanol and Fusel Oil
Beer, wine, and spirits are not pure ethanol/water mixtures, but instead contain — depending on the method of production — thousands of other compounds.
In a classic study, G. K. S. Pawan from Middlesex Hospital, London, UK, investigated various drinks in terms of their tendency to produce a hangover . Twenty healthy, male volunteers (no alcoholics) got drunk at weekly intervals successively on red wine, white wine, rum, whiskey, gin, vodka, brandy, or straight alcohol (20 vol % in water). The amount consumed was always measured such that each subject reached a blood-alcohol content of 1.7 ‰ – in other words, complete intoxication.
After eight weeks, each participant had experienced and survived a fully intoxicated state from each type of drink, and was able to evaluate the severity of the resulting hangover symptoms. It turned out that there was a definite relationship between the intensity of the hangover and the beverage: brandy produced the most severe hangover, followed (in descending order) by red wine, rum, whiskey, white wine, and gin. Vodka and pure alcohol were tolerated the best.
It is well known that higher alcohols present in relatively high concentration in beer, wine, and spirits all can cause hangover symptoms. The fraction boiling above 95 °C (ethanol b.p. = 78 °C) is designated as fusel oil. This may be shown to contain up to 50 different components, where the chief constituents are isobutanol (2-methyl-1-propanol), propanol, and above all, the pair of isoamylalkohols: 2-methyl-1-butanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol. The latter two form from the amino acids isoleucine and leucine by protein degradation during fermentation (Fig. 5).
Figure 5. Gas chromatograms of some spirits. In each case, 1 μL of the spirit was introduced into a helium stream passing through a 25 m column (0.32 mm diameter), with a coating of polyethylene glycol (molecular weight 20,000). Polyethylene glycol is a relatively polar material with a great affinity for other polar compounds, so small nonpolar molecules pass through the column most rapidly. Each gas chromatographic signal represents at least one substance. The signal for ethanol, present in great excess, has been truncated.
Right: Clear grain spirits, like vodka and gin, contain — apart from ethanol — only small amounts of other volatile compounds. Brandy contains only ca. 10 % wine distillate, and is brought up to 28–32 vol % by the addition of grain alcohol. A pure brandy, such as cognac, contains a multitude of volatile compounds, which contribute significantly to its typical bouquet and taste. In other words, in the absence of these admixtures, cognac would no longer be cognac.
Left: The gas chromatograms of two grappas reveal something about their origins. Grappa is prepared by the fermentation of grape residues after pressing, with subsequent distillation. As a fermented and distilled grape product, grappa contains volatile ingredients also typical of cognac. Compared with the premium grappa from Marchesi Antinori, Florence, Italy, the grappa distillate from a rural “moonshiner” (above) displays a significantly larger fusel oil fraction. Especially noteworthy is the increased ethyl acetate content (signal 2), which lends grappa a relatively sharp tone. Moreover, the increased level of long-chain, higher-boiling alcohols points to an unprofessional distillation that was terminated much too late, since fusel oils distill over precisely in the tailings. This grappa actually does taste unpleasantly sharp, and has a penetrating aftertaste, strongly reminiscent of solvent (ethyl acetate).
Methanol is the most toxic of the aliphatic alcohols, and the one of greatest toxicological interest. Its oxidation leads to formaldehyde and formic acid. Typical symptoms of methanol poisoning are visual disorders (e.g., the impression of a snowstorm), which can lead to blindness and even death. In the case of serious poisoning, one can actually smell formaldehyde on the subject’s exhaled breath.
Methanol has a lower affinity for ADH (alcohol dehydrogenase) than ethanol, which is to say that with a mixture of the two alcohols, it is the ethanol that is metabolized first . Drinking a large quantity of methanol-containing spirits can therefore lead to an accumulation of methanol, which is itself affected only after complete metabolism of the ethanol. On the other hand, in the case of acute methanol poisoning, ethanol is often introduced into the victim intravenously in order to block the oxidation of methanol and gain time: for dialysis, for example.
Almost all spirits contain some methanol, which arises as part of the fermentation process from pectins. Pectins are linear polysaccharides derived from galactouronic acid units, where some of the carboxylic acid groups are esterified with methanol (Fig. 6).
Figure 6. Pectin.
During fermentation, the ester groups are hydrolyzed, and methanol is released. An especially high methanol concentration is associated with the brandies derived from various types of fruit, such as pears, plums, and cherries, which contain large amounts of heavily esterified pectin (Tab. 3, Fig. 5).
Table 3. Volatile compounds in spirits . All reported quantities in mg/100 mL of pure alcohol; i-amyl alcohols are 2-methyl-butanol and 3-methylbutanol.
Boozy celebrations can lead to hangovers taking a variety of forms, and tormenting the body in every place imaginable, often in subtle ways. But the multitude of possible metabolic disruptions is far outnumbered by the inventory of traditional recipes and quack remedies for “curing” a hangover. Indeed, what HASN’T been tried for hangover relief? Leg compresses, every conceivable sort of tea and herb extract, eating pickled herring and dill pickles (in fact, one would be strongly advised to avoid pickled herring and dill pickles, a proverbial hangover breakfast, since an assaulted stomach lining absolutely cannot tolerate acidic and aggressive foods), warm milk with honey, further imbibing in the last alcoholic beverage consumed, athletics, vitamin tablets, dextrose, juice, chicken broth, etc., etc. Almost none of these therapeutic measures have been subjected to clinical testing, which many would regard as unnecessary anyway since all of them help, sooner or later. Finally, almost every hangover ends eventually, with or without treatment.
Some of the hangover symptoms can be alleviated medicinally, for example by acidic buffers in the case of nausea and gastritis. Aspirin and ibuprofen will help with headaches, but they simultaneously induce the stomach to generate acid, which should be taken into consideration in the case of upper abdominal pain and nausea.
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) is a popular remedy for headaches, and is present in many over-the-counter painkillers. But frequent ethanol consumption activates MEOS metabolism (Microsomal Ethanol Oxidizing System), and resulting monooxygenases can oxidize acetaminophen to the carcinogen N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine . It is true that MEOS ethanol metabolism ordinarily plays only a secondary role, but acetaminophen still should not be taken to combat a hangover.
A great many other things have been tried. The alleged positive effects of beta-blockers, serotonin antagonists, and coffee consumption could not be verified clinically . With a stomach under attack, one should in any case forego coffee.
Overall it must be soberly reported that a hangover is comprised of many factors, and that little can be done for it therapeutically: There is no real cure for a hangover. ChemViews recommends lots of water against the dehydration, aspirin or ibuprofen against the throbbing headache, fruit juice against hypoglycemia, Mom’s powerful chicken soup to compensate for electrolyte losses, a vitamin pill because of its powerful placebo-effect, compassion and words of comfort from loved ones, and finally — if blood circulation and control of the lower extremities permit an upright walk — a long stroll in fresh air. Meanwhile, one should think deeply about the pointlessness of excessive drinking, because only one thing is absolutely certain: one only gets a hangover only after a bout of heavy drinking.
All this helps and on the next day it will all be over — at least until next time. Well then: Cheers and Bottoms up!
 J. G. Wiese et al., Ann. Int. Med. 2000, 132, 897. Link
 G. L. S. Pawan, Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1973, 32, 15A. DOI: 10.1079/PNS19730007
 H.-T. Haffner et al., Legal Medicine 1992, 105, 111.
 C. Girre et al., Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Research 1993, 17, 170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00743.x
 R. Swift, D. Davidson, Alcohol Health & Res. World 1998, 22, 54. Link
Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
The article has been published in German in:
and was translated by W. E. Russey.
Other articles by Klaus Roth published by ChemViews magazine:
Article Views: 8170