Periodic Debate

  • ChemPubSoc Europe Logo
  • DOI: 10.1002/chemv.201000093
  • Author: David Bradley
  • Published Date: 09 June 2011
  • Copyright: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
thumbnail image: Periodic Debate
Complete, But Not Finished

Non-chemists, and perhaps a few chemists, might have assumed that once all the holes in Mendeleev's Periodic Table were filled with modern discoveries and the lanthanides and actinides added, that the Table was forever immutable, a stone tablet to adorn high school chemistry lab walls, textbooks and websites unchanged forever more ...

Well, they'd be very wrong, aside from the recent didacts on atomic masses and isotope ratios wrought on the elements in December 2010 by IUPAC and the official recruitment of elements 114 and 116, there are several issues that have got many chemists in a boiling reflux.

For instance, there are 3D PTs, spirals, circular tables, stepped and even fractal tables (Fig. 1). Eric Scerri, University of California Los Angeles, USA, is developing an alternative approach to that is intuitive and might take us closer to an ultimate version. Scerri's argument for change is based on the fact that the Periodic Table arose from the discovery of triads of atomic weights, but he thinks chemists would be better served if they were to recognize the fundamental importance of triads of atomic number instead. His new Periodic Table could be fundamentally closer to the ideal.

This is perhaps especially pertinent given that atomic mass varies according to isotope ratio (neutron count, in other words), whereas atomic number (proton count) is fixed for each element. In it, listings of electron shells follow an ordered pattern, so that the halogens form the first column on the left, topped by hydrogen, the noble gases are the second column, topped by helium. The alkali metals and the alkaline earth metals follow, then the block of transition metals. The semi-metals and the non-metals then form the final four columns (Fig. 2).

Figure 1.  Some alternative Periodic Table designs.

Positioning Helium

As if this restructuring of the groups were not controversial enough, it is the logical relocation of hydrogen and helium that stirs deep chemical emotions, even though they recreate the atomic number triads of He-Ne-Ar and H-F-Cl invisible in the conventional PT. However, not everyone is convinced by helium's placement. US chemist Henry Bent would prefer to see helium atop beryllium in the otherwise "normal" PT layout. He argues that although helium seems to fit perfectly at the top of the noble gases its presence there breaks several of the rules.

Scerri is quite adamant that there is one true and objective periodic classification but others believe that such an ultimate PT does not exist and that our perspective inevitably distorts reality. Software engineer Melinda Green from Superliminal Software, developed a fractal PT for educational use and believes any arrangement is purely subjective. "Neither the periodicity nor any classification is intrinsic to nature," explains Green.

Atomic number is perhaps the only intrinsic property of the elements, as suggested by Scerri too, but, adds Green, this is only fundamental by our subjective definition of the term "element" rather than it representing something ultimate about the universe as Scerri's reasoning would suggest. "Every description requires a describer," says Green. "Subjectivity is not just an annoyance, it is the source of all meaning."

Art and Function

So, is the menagerie of different PTs, nothing more than an art gallery? Martyn Poliakoff thinks so. Poliakoff is a professor of chemistry at the University of Nottingham, UK, working on supercritical fluids who has gained recent fame for the Periodic Table of Videos project. His is a pragmatic perspective. "I regard the PT as a tool like a hammer and, just like other tools, you have different forms for different purposes (e.g., a claw-hammer and a mallet). There just isn't a "right" and "wrong" form," he told ChemistryViews. He suggests that the different forms can be useful, however. "These weird forms of the PT often serve a purpose by highlighting some aspect of the elements that one might not otherwise have noticed," he adds.

However, Scerri is convinced there is something more fundamental to the ultimate PT. "It concerns me that scientists can express 'relativistic' [aesthetic] views on something as important as the Periodic Table," he says. "It is after all the most profound and deep classification that has ever been discovered." But Poliakoff has the last word: "In the end, I think that one should remember that Mendeleev devised the PT for a textbook to help rationalize the mass of facts in inorganic chemistry," he adds, "For me, the PT remains a tool to help reduce the complexity, not a metaphysical truth that has a correct form yet to be discovered."

Figure 2. Scerri stuff indeed — a new, rearranged Periodic Table.

► Read on:

At Last, A Definitive Periodic Table?, David Bradley

20 July 2011 — ChemViews article and ensuing discussion has spawned a development in this field courtesy of UCLA chemistry professor E. Scerri

Article Views: 104379

Sign in Area

Please sign in below

Additional Sign In options

Please note that to comment on an article you must be registered and logged in.
Registration is for free, you may already be registered to receive, e.g., the newsletter. When you register on this website, please ensure you view our terms and conditions. All comments are subject to moderation.

Article Comments - To add a comment please sign in


Jess Tauber wrote:

Madelung's Rule

'I have one thing to say, and that's, Dammit Janet, I love you.....' with apologies to Barry Bostwick. Susan Sarandon, however, apologies there! Might certain nuclear transmutations be characterized, tongue firmly in cheek, as 'a jump to the left, and then a step to the right'? Just trying to shine a light in the darkness. LIPS!!!!! Jess Tauber

Tue Jul 19 11:08:08 UTC 2011

Philip Stewart wrote:

"Madelung's" Rule

Just a reminder that "Madelung's" Rule was first enunciated by Janet in 1930 (also apparently by Karapetoff, but in a journal as untraceable as Timmothy Stowe). See my article on Janet in FoC , 2009, DOI 10.1007/s10698-008-9062-5

Tue Jul 19 05:50:51 UTC 2011

Valery Tsimmerman wrote:

Question about exclusions from n+l rule

Some time ago Eric asked very interesting question regarding to elements such as Cu and Cr that are considered to be exclusions from n+l rule, also called Madelung rule. I would like to make clarification to my earlier responses. Madelung rule states that electrons occupy orbitals in order of increasing n+l value. If we write down n+l values for all elements from Sc to Zn, for example, we would get: 5, 5, 5, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4. Obviously, the exclusions from n+l rule in this example are elements with n+l=4, which are Mn and Zn, not Cr and Cu. ____Both Cr and Cu are exclusions from electron configuration "standards", not from n+l rule.____Since electrons are indistinguishable from each other , I proposed on my web site to use Maximum n+l Values Attained by Electrons instead of n+l values attained by "differentiating" electron. If maximum n+l values attained by electrons are used, the sequence above would be 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5. ____Slight modification of n+l rule formulation results in elimination of exclusions. Valery Tsimmerman.

Mon Jul 18 22:11:04 UTC 2011

Jess Tauber wrote:


Primarily nuclei of course, though electrons start getting naughty eventually. What the heck, momenta are conserved, so why am I complaining? Not to quote a particularly nasty wench with a wand, who is gonna get hers this summer, but still 'I WILL HAVE ORDER!!'...... Jess Tauber

Mon Jul 18 14:30:58 UTC 2011

Eric Scerri wrote:

Spin Orbit

The magnitude of S-O coupling in electrons is a good deal smaller than in nuclei. I take it that you are referring to S.O. in electrons however?____Or are you talking about nuclear structure? ______Please see chapter 10 of my book. (OUP, 2007).

Mon Jul 18 03:01:50 UTC 2011

Page:   Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Bookmark and Share

If you would like to reuse any content, in print or online, from, please contact us first for permission. more

CONNECT: on Facebook on Twitter on YouTube on LinkedIn Sign up for our free newsletter

A product of ChemPubSoc Europe (16 European Chemical Societies)and Wiley-VCH